Re: What's the Big Deal with Firefox?
Ron Hunter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.windows |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <cs6mep$2id3__13632.1003585637$1105650793$gmane$org@ripley.netscape.com> |
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote: > Ron Hunter wrote: > >> Matthias Versen wrote: >> >>> Ron Hunter wrote: >>> >>>> There are MANY advantages to FF/TB combination over Mozilla Suite. >>>> First, if you download the various dailies, then you only need to >>>> download whichever portion you want to update. Second, FF handles >>>> things like bookmarks and personal toolbar MUCH better than MSuite. >>>> FF has a smaller ram footprint (for those who care), loads faster, >>>> and seems to run a bit faster. If it seems less stable, it is >>>> because it is >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The RAM footprint is better with Mozilla if you use both , the >>> browser and mail. >>> >>> There are many negative things for me in FF: >>> Bad Password Manager, no search through the URL Bar (with dropdown), >>> popup blocking note above the page content and not in the status >>> bar,..... >>> >>> I can't see a reason to use firefox... >>> >>> >>> Matthias >> >> >> Your choice. Mzny like it better. > > > The problem is Mozilla is getting a way from choice. > > It will be IE/OE paradigm or nothing. > > Many of us like the Netscape/Mozilla all-in-one approach and can't stand > having to open 4 or 5 different programs to get work done. FF and TB is two, not four or five. > > Others Like to open something for Mail, something for news, something > for web webrowsing, something for ftp download, something for FTP > Upload, something else for another thing down the line. > > To me that's wasting time, and computer resources (yes even if you have > 1.5 gb ram and 120gb Hard drive) opening a new appliacation for a > different thing; when you can open one thing and be able to switch to a > different component. you can even leave that component runing in > backgound just go to window and click on item you want to see. You > eventuall have so many things open its difficult to see what's doing what. > Well, if you can't manage two applications, maybe you should consider some other hobby. > Supposedly the advantage is not for the operator. But for the developer > instead of developing as a component that must work with other > components within the application. If the components are broken down > into separate applications, they don't have to worry about > compatibility, and just worry about getting that application to work. Yes, and that is an advantage, because I sure like my applications to work!