Re: What's the Big Deal with Firefox?

"Howard Brazee" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.windows
Organization Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Message-ID <cs95fk$6nn3__6451.41334175623$1105730955$gmane$org@ripley.netscape.com>
On 14-Jan-2005, Ed Mullen <[email protected]> wrote:

> .  I prefer the suite concept over the FF + TB concept, so
> >>Mozilla is just a better fit for me.
> >
> >
> > If you prefer the suite concept over the best of breed concepts, then you're
> > the ideal MicroSoft customer.
>
> Why in heavens name would you reply like that to a very reasonable
> response?  Sheesh.  It doesn't even make sense.  Microsoft's analogous
> products are NOT a suite like Mozilla.  IE and OE are just like FF and
> TB: a *pair* of apps.

Outlook is part of Office.

> And "best of breed" may be arguable for FF vs. IE, I'm not sure TB is
> there yet.  Neither, separately or paired, in my experience, is a match
> for the Suite.  Just my opinion.

The discussion is which concept is better, not which implementation.   He
prefers the suite concept.   Microsoft likes to sell suits to people who like
the suite concept and who might or might not have bought Access along with their
Excel, had they been shopping for best of breed.

Implementation issues can override philosophical preferences, but the above
quote was only concerned with the latter.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.