Re: What's the Big Deal with Firefox?
ScrubsFan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.windows |
|---|---|
| Organization | EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net |
| Message-ID | <wNZFd.7024$pZ4.1382__18898.2005500749$1105750708$gmane$org@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> |
Howard Brazee wrote: > On 13-Jan-2005, ScrubsFan <[email protected]> wrote: >>While I don't really consider Mozilla to be "plain vanilla," I, too, use >>it over Firefox. I've tried Firefox and it's perfectly okay, but I use >>Mozilla because of its other features, such as the mail and news >>clients. I prefer the suite concept over the FF + TB concept, so >>Mozilla is just a better fit for me. > If you prefer the suite concept over the best of breed concepts, then you're the > ideal MicroSoft customer. Really? That's odd: I've been a UNIX/Linux programmer and sysadmin since 1986. I despise Micro$haft and everything it stands for. I only keep 'doze on two of my computers so I can play Roller Coaster Tycoon and a few other games. BTW, I have no idea why you'd make such a stupid comment as it has nothing to do with discussing Mozilla vs Firefox. Also, you said in another post that "HE" prefers the suite concept--I am not a he. -- FREE "Bushisms" screensavers: www.smartassproducts.com/downloads.shtml Hillary Clinton 2008 merchandise: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228355 Bush or chimp?: www.bushorchimp.com/pics.html Dogs hate Bu$h, too: www.dogshatebush.com