Re: What's the Big Deal with Firefox?

ScrubsFan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.windows
Organization EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Message-ID <wNZFd.7024$pZ4.1382__18898.2005500749$1105750708$gmane$org@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Howard Brazee wrote:
> On 13-Jan-2005, ScrubsFan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>While I don't really consider Mozilla to be "plain vanilla," I, too, use
>>it over Firefox.  I've tried Firefox and it's perfectly okay, but I use
>>Mozilla because of its other features, such as the mail and news
>>clients.  I prefer the suite concept over the FF + TB concept, so
>>Mozilla is just a better fit for me.

> If you prefer the suite concept over the best of breed concepts, then you're the
> ideal MicroSoft customer.

Really?  That's odd: I've been a UNIX/Linux programmer and sysadmin 
since 1986.  I despise Micro$haft and everything it stands for.  I only 
keep 'doze on two of my computers so I can play Roller Coaster Tycoon 
and a few other games.

BTW, I have no idea why you'd make such a stupid comment as it has 
nothing to do with discussing Mozilla vs Firefox.  Also, you said in 
another post that "HE" prefers the suite concept--I am not a he.

-- 

FREE "Bushisms" screensavers: www.smartassproducts.com/downloads.shtml
Hillary Clinton 2008 merchandise: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228355
Bush or chimp?: www.bushorchimp.com/pics.html
Dogs hate Bu$h, too: www.dogshatebush.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.