Re: Feedback on XML content sink plans

Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>  > Don¹t be incremental with DOM LS.
>>
>> I don't believe we implement that, do we?
> 
> What's nsLoadSaveContentSink for?

DOM LS.  But if you note, it's not actually compiled.  ;)

> Perhaps forking it isn't a good idea after all. Would it be smart to 
> move SinkContext into a separate .cpp/h file pair and inherit an 
> nsHTMLSinkContext and an nsXMLSinkContext so that the XML side would 
> only have one context?

Hmm... That might be a reasonable approach...  Run that by sicking and peterv?

-Boris