Re: The future of XML related technologies in Mozilla

Ian Hickson <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:56:47 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.xml
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> OK, I sense a significant communications failure here.  Let's say we 
> have:
> 
>   <div id="foo">Text</div>
> 
> and script as follows:
> 
>   var node = document.getElementById("foo");
>   var str = (new DOMSerializer()).serializeToString(node);
>   var str2 = node.innerHTML.
> 
> Then str is the string:  '<div id="foo">Text</div>' while str2 is the 
> string:  'Text'
> 
> To get the string in |str| using innerHTML, you would have to use the 
> code with importNode and company that I posted in my previous post. This 
> is why outerHTML exists, fwiw.

Oh, I see what you're saying. I have no objection to introducing outerHTML 
as well. Currently I haven't done so mostly because Mozilla doesn't 
support it, so I assumed there wasn't strong demand for it.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'