Re: Compiler ABI changes and XPCOM components

Pete Collins wrote:
> Er, the whole point of XPCOM is to abstract binary libs from the 
> interfaces they implement.

There is nothing XPCOM can do about this. Different C++ Compilers mangle 
function names differently, so that a gcc3-compiled Plugin will expect a 
different function name from what actually exists on a gcc2-compiled 
Mozilla.


-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                                  -- Benjamin Franklin