Re: Signing Firefox extensions
Jeff Klawiter <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:06:10 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.xpinstall |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You can try checking out and compiling the new signtool which has this support or use the workaround mentioned here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248751 Jeff Klawiter Thomas Ventimiglia wrote: > My company is developing a Firefox 1.0 extension and we would like to > digitally sign the XPI. However, Firefox will not recognize the XPI as > being signed. We have a certificate from a reputable CA, and have attempted > to sign the file using Java's keytool/jarsigner and Netscape signtool. In > both cases, the resulting XPI contains a META-INF directory containing the > files manifest.mf, zigbert.rsa and zigbert.sf. ( For the Java tools the > names of the rsa and sf files are a prefix of the owner of the certificate). > > In examining the problem, I also tried to install the "simple signed XPI > testcase" at http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpinstall/signed/testcases/, > but Firefox did not recognize this as being signed either. The only XPI > that appears in Firefox as being signed is > http://www.swiftview.com/product/sv_710/svinstall_p.xpi (cf Bugzilla post > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273406 ). > > Has anyone else experienced this problem, and know if special steps must be > taken in signing XPIs? Also, to examine the problem further, I would like > to try to install other signed XPIs, but in general I have had difficulty > finding signed XPI files. If anyone knows of any others please let me know. > > Tom > > >