Re: DevMo gets automatically-generated license text and next/prev/toc links

Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>>Approved licenses are the CC Attribution and Attribution Share-Alike 2.0
>>Licenses.
> 
> Is this policy going to be applied to new docs on www.mozilla.org as 
> well?

No plans for www.mozilla.org yet, but I'm pretty sure website-drivers wouldn't
object to new documents being licensed under these licenses. The mozilla.org
build system, though, isn't set up to label things like DevMo is.

> I'm just curious about the rationale behind the license choice. Why were 
> CC-A and CC-SA licenses chosen over some other licenses that are 
> designed for Free Software documentation?

I'll have to let Gerv or Mitchell answer that question. GNU FDL, which I
guess is what you're referring too, was seen as more troublesome than the
CC licenses.

~fantasai