Re: [Enigmail] jsunit updates and distribution

john doe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.enigmail.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 9/17/2019 3:58 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Patrick, and other enigmail folks--
>
> I'm trying to sort out enigmail 2.1 for debian with tbird 68.
>
> i note that to properly test the new enigmail, i need a newer version of
> jsunit for the testing, so i'd like to ship that in debian too.  at
> https://www.enigmail.net/jsunit/ i see that jsunit 0.2.2 is available.
>
> i notice a few things that seem amiss with jsunit distribution.  I've
> ordered them from highest priority to lowest priority as i see it -- but
> if you can fix any of them, that would be great:
>
>  * The git repo at https://git.code.sf.net/u/pbrunschwig/jsunit/source
>    has no tags for anything after jsunit-0.2.0, even though
>    https://www.enigmail.net/jsunit/ lists 0.2.1 and 0.2.2.
>
>  * The git tags that i do see don't appear to be signed.  Please sign
>    any new tags you create!
>

And also, signing of commit.

>  * The git repo at https://git.code.sf.net/u/pbrunschwig/jsunit/source
>    has an erroneous tag jsunit-1.1.2 -- maybe you want to clean that up
>    with something like (untested, i know this syntax works with
>    branches, but i don't know about tags):
>
>        git push origin :jsunit-1.1.2
>

Creating a new tag with the correct tag is best; I never remove
something that is publicly available.

--
John Doe

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.