Re: [Enigmail] jsunit updates and distribution

john doe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.enigmail.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 9/17/2019 5:22 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> john doe wrote on 17.09.2019 16:37:
>> On 9/17/2019 3:58 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> Hi Patrick, and other enigmail folks--
>>>
>>> I'm trying to sort out enigmail 2.1 for debian with tbird 68.
>>>
>>> i note that to properly test the new enigmail, i need a newer version of
>>> jsunit for the testing, so i'd like to ship that in debian too.  at
>>> https://www.enigmail.net/jsunit/ i see that jsunit 0.2.2 is available.
>>>
>>> i notice a few things that seem amiss with jsunit distribution.  I've
>>> ordered them from highest priority to lowest priority as i see it -- but
>>> if you can fix any of them, that would be great:
>>>
>>>  * The git repo at https://git.code.sf.net/u/pbrunschwig/jsunit/source
>>>    has no tags for anything after jsunit-0.2.0, even though
>>>    https://www.enigmail.net/jsunit/ lists 0.2.1 and 0.2.2.
>>>
>>>  * The git tags that i do see don't appear to be signed.  Please sign
>>>    any new tags you create!
>>>
>>
>> And also, signing of commit.
>
> No, I won't sign commits. I'm fine signing tags (like I did for years on
> Enigmail), but I will not sign commits.
>

Do you mind explaining why you are against signing commits?

--
John Doe

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.