Re: [Enigmail] Future OpenPGP Support in Thunderbird

"Robert J. Hansen" <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:49:23 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.enigmail.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> In particular I hope, that Mozilla will not follow your example and
> won’t entice users to proprietary isolated keyserver [0]

The Hagrid codebase is not proprietary.  It's been fully open sourced
and is developed by the same people behind the open-source SequoiaPGP.

I understand you don't like a single point of failure.  However, the SKS
system is simply no longer sustainable.  Point-blank, it is dead as far
as Enigmail is considered.

Imagine you're using Enigmail with an SKS-configured keyserver.  You
have a question about Enigmail, so you decide to email one of Enigmail's
user-outreach guys -- namely, me.  So you find my email address, pull
down my certificate from the keyserver, and now GnuPG is *completely*
wedged.

Yes, you can say "but users shouldn't even be suffering that any more,
GnuPG fixed the quadratic-time key parsing bug".  But there's a big
difference between saying what users *should* do and recognizing what
users *actually do*, which is

(a) not update GnuPG, and
(b) blame Enigmail for anything which goes wrong, and
(c) yell at me.

So unless you're willing to field all the hate mail from users, well,
this complaint's going in the circular file.  :)

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRL8gQq4o9iuBc26MuoPK6U09w4cwUCXZy+EwAKCRCoPK6U09w4
c/agAP0XZt+gXJSU6m8rNwl83277VUoe79w6FuwyJW9OHBilWQEAg87CEV6mjaVs
SQhU+6tjku1FURFhUeK4wu38dsEVwQE=
=zTVc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----