Re: [Enigmail] Enigmail GNOME keyring handling
Patrick Brunschwig <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jan 2020 09:21:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.enigmail.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote on 02.01.2020 19:52: > Am 02.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Patrick Brunschwig: >> Robert J. Hansen wrote on 02.01.2020 16:26: >>>> Using Enigmail for some time now - thanks for your work! >>> Patrick deserves all the credit; the rest of us just try to help him >>> with the load of questions. :) Which is hard, given that he usually >>> beats us to answering them! >>> >>>> As I understand, the GPG key for a specific email address is saved >>>> inside the keyring, in my case the GNOME keyring. To decrypt an >>>> encrypted email Enigmail needs to have access to that keyring. Which >>>> means, the GNOME keyring needs to be unlocked so that Enigmail can >>>> access it and read the according GPG key. >>> Nope. :) >>> >>> GnuPG is the one popping up those passphrase dialogs, not Enigmail. >>> We've got nothing to do with it. We never touch your keyring. Although >>> I think your feature request is pretty reasonable, it's also beyond >>> Enigmail's scope. Perhaps ask on GnuPG-Users, or on a GNOME mailing list? > Thanks for the clarification. >> The above said, I assume that what happens is this: if GNOME keyring is >> already running when gpg requires a password, it will connect to the >> running instance of GNOME keyring and get the password from there. If >> GNOME keyring is not already running, then gpg will need to start a >> "keyring" tool on its own. And the only tool known to gpg is gpg-agent. >> >> -Patrick > > Thanks for pointing that out. So, just for my understanding: Are you > happy - design-wise - with the fact that if the keyring is not unlocked > a user is asked for the GPG key even it is already available in the > keyring? What do you think would need to change on the GPG side if a > user would like to have the keyring unlocked by Enigmail instead of > requesting the GPG key? This is clearly the fault of GNOME, or the way your distribution is configured. GPG contains a component called gpg-agent that is designed to deal with handling keys and passphrases. If GNOME decides to hijack gpg-agent then that's entirely their decision, and you can't blame GPG for working that. -Patrick _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEET5+J9VBawdGiYGMc2xGHud1faTsFAl4O+ZAACgkQ2xGHud1f aTuVKA//RnjAHCo1oIn0r9sN+91nBsxBtrheNz7bP+/HmNAtsbjZXKxecC//4PnM 7YAOcvpzvbQpVrFBBJA4EU7tXQU17UtKZU2McKEpGtbfZqgqFiX7NDp/HEvIuj// Q0ezWZ9LkPCf05EmfubHKeauxqSzUsmdu3SdkQZrWkrDYbbcBfwJRCP923lr30Va N1JCzI8VNCmTtKoSa5lWrfFcQXl8ZQZtbG/ABJ2A1e1qkptvXQYMortCZt+wpAGE d+dAQXt06FlBpWKzKM2zXMVfIVTuwjK66lwQr2WYN54m3USnRNa3o8O5PiphUBcl biWMdbLv1HnaQeYl9+DZKefLdFNTJrHxOF9TnbDprkHU2bAidBS9X2pZFIPFEwQF e5QH2bteTPTqEcFbjgY4D0T9Qg08oBym3YutM6Lx6Y37ZwukRt0jWW1td1RwgPwt RhBLVMLmuSP70LmoEQx6cWTEIdrXqGeHFyA4287Lz/bOs8UzlLC5e1A+WnYUJE6j 5ikX59C3bwJKSXSo0m8Ov/UemhUNe7APpW/XdYGgy9yT1cfp2MOaaE0+9FfswMyH mO0HHd5G0hvTJfWbkNIb+dpUPNjJ8FGHfsPnHcE4YBCpaAUgIyS5QLdliIfK3Dfu FaVfMEQTmiqpdgspRhYFWMDqHndbobyYbxD9YeY8/7o/jaL60h8= =RFBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----