Re: Firefox extensions
"Jim Fisher" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5 Jan 2021 at 17:27, Wolf K wrote: > On 2021-01-05 16:30, Jim Fisher wrote: > > On 4 Jan 2021 at 20:28, The Real Bev wrote: > > > >> On 01/04/2021 01:09 PM, Peter wrote: > >>> On 1/4/2021 2:55 PM, The Real Bev wrote: > >>>> I've configured Firefox 83 to look as much like the ancient versions as > >>>> possible. My top toolbar now shows < File Edit View History Bookmarks > >>>> Tools Help > . I know I had to do something special to get this, but > >>>> looking at a list of my extensions and the .css files doesn't seem to show > >>>> anything related to that. > >>>> > >>>> I only update when I get too many YOU NEED TO UPDATE YOUR BROWSER > >>>> messages at websites I actually want to see, but I always worry about > >>>> losing something important to me -- which is pretty much a 'given'. > >>>> > >>>> Anybody know how I got those items in the toolbar? > >>>> > >>>> And for extra credit, is there any way to get actual WORDS under the > >>>> extension icons in the toolbars? I have LOTS and they're too small to > >>>> actually interpret even if I could actually do that. Remember, I see the > >>>> 'seatbelt' icon as "Ladies, please keep your knees together." > >>>> > >>> > >>> Position the mouse cursor in the blank space on the right side of the > >>> window tab and right click the mouse. A short drop down menu should > >>> appear that contains 7 items. The 5th item is "Menu Bar", which will > >>> have a check mark next to it when your File Edit View History Bookmarks > >>> Tools Help headers are displayed. > >> > >> Nope. Two items: 'Menu Bar' and 'Bookmarks Bar'. Both checked. No > >> cycling, just off/on. 'Customize' at the bottom, which shows the > >> 'overflow menu' which contains nothing I care about. > >> > >>> You can cycle those headers, which > >>> Firefox designates as the "Menu Bar" by repetitively left clicking the > >>> mouse while the cursor is positioned anywhere along that line of the > >>> drop down menu. > >> > >> Nope, just off/on. Photo here: https://photos.app.goo.gl/NgapRugfUTEKNqCv6 > >> > >>> Can't help with icon titles. Perhaps it's available in some Themes, but > >>> I've never explored that. > >> > >> Real shame that some of feel comfier with words than pictures. > > > > I thought hieroglyphics went out at around the time of the pharoahs. Never > > understood why people want to switch back when using computers. > > > > Jim Fisher > > > > Erm, hieroglyphics aren't ideograms, they are logograms. A logogram > represents a word. Computer icons don't represent words, they represent > concepts. > > Begin lesson :-) > > Computer icons are technically ideograms, signs that represent concepts. > The most commonly used ideograms are the numerals, 1,2,3 etc, which > represent the same numerical concepts, but different words in different > languages. Ideograms work if and only if their users have agreed on > their meanings. Thus computer icons and emojis, and international > symbols as used in airports. Etc. > > Egyptian hieroglyphs are a combination of ideograms and phonetic signs. > The phonetic signs have fixed conceptual meanings when used alone, but > in combination indicate a sound, or suggest rhyming words, etc. Thus, > with a few rules about how to read combinations of symbols, the > Egyptians could write any word in their language, and could spell out > words (names, usually) from any foreign language. The Phoenicians took > that latter principle a step further, and invented the world's first > true alphabet. All alphabets are derived from it. > > Of course, it's all rather more complicated than that. Writing is one of > the most astonishing human inventions. Right up there with the wheel. > > End lesson :-) Thanks Wolf. I wasn't intending my comment to be taken quite that literally! Incidentally, the meanings of all too many icons used in computer programs seem to vary from program to program, with only a very few more or less standardised. In normal writing, even the numerals 1, 2, 3 etc are not universally used. Arabic and Chinese both have different sets of symbols to represent numbers. Jim