Re: Updates changing defaults, refusing themes, killing extensions, etc
"David E. Ross" <not_me@not_there.invalid> Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:58:50 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | I am @ david at rossde dot com. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/26/2021 11:07 AM, Wolf K wrote: > A thread in the mozilla.firefox NG asserts that 85.x, like 78.x, changes > the Update default to Automatic. Actually, automatic update has been the > default for FF and TB for some time now. But it grates when an update to > change a default from the user's preference. > > I eliminated TB 78.x and installed 68.12.0, the last one for which my > fave extensions still work. Even so, it won't accept themes, which > Mozilla in its infinite wisdom has decided should not be allowed any > more. Well, Mozilla should at least offer infinitely variable colours > for the standard theme. > > But the main problem is the extensions. IMO, the functionality of most > of them should be included as options in TB and FF. I know that most > people will use the software as it comes, but when tens of thousands of > people install extensions focussed on the same functionality (eg, > control over fonts in TB's folder pane, etc), then surely that should > tell the devs that there's real need for that functionality. > > I see that FF has been losing to Chrome. I don't think that's entirely > the result of Mozilla ignoring users' plaintive pleas for improvements. > The power of FF has always been customisation. The latest versions > reduce that power. So what's the difference between FF and Chrome or > Edge? Not much any more. Hence not much incentive for switching to or > keeping FF. You describe exactly why I am remaining with SeaMonkey 2.49.5 (which I do not use for E-mail or newsgroups) and Thunderbird 52.9.1. I am also remaining with Windows 7 because I have software I use that is no longer being maintained but cannot run under later Windows versions. I definitely do not need a Windows version that supports touch screens. I have a PC (not a laptop or tablet) with a monitor positioned two arms-length from me. I cannot reach my monitor, so why would I want touch screen capabilities? -- David E. Ross <http://www.rossde.com/>. The only reason we have so many laws is that not enough people will do the right thing. (© 1997 by David Ross) _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general