Re: What work should be done on distributing to make my application working only in MPL?

johnsonlau <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.license
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <0c214bc8-682d-48c1-85b1-a5bfd92dcfff@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
On 7月13日, 下午7时09分, Frank Hecker <[email protected]> wrote:
> johnsonlau wrote:
> > If I want my application to be distributed only in MPL, not GPL nor
> > LGPL,
> > and I ensure that my work doesn't envolve any GPL / LGPL codes,
> > how do I include licensing information in my product?
> > Can I just simply remove "Alternatively, ..." in section "EXHIBIT A"?
>
> Yes. As Section 13 of the MPL states, "Initial Developer *may* designate
> portions of the Covered Code as 'Multiple-Licensed'." (emphasis added).
> Using multiple licensing is an option, not a mandatory practice. The
> example in Exhibit A shows how to indicate the use of multiple
> licensing, if you want to use it. If you don't want to use multiple
> licensing then you can simply leave off the "Alternatively, ..."
> paragraph when putting the MPL license notice in your own files.
>
> Frank
>
> --
> Frank Hecker
> [email protected]

Thank you. Frank.

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal