Re: What work should be done on distributing to make my application working only in MPL?
johnsonlau <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <0c214bc8-682d-48c1-85b1-a5bfd92dcfff@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> |
On 7月13日, 下午7时09分, Frank Hecker <[email protected]> wrote: > johnsonlau wrote: > > If I want my application to be distributed only in MPL, not GPL nor > > LGPL, > > and I ensure that my work doesn't envolve any GPL / LGPL codes, > > how do I include licensing information in my product? > > Can I just simply remove "Alternatively, ..." in section "EXHIBIT A"? > > Yes. As Section 13 of the MPL states, "Initial Developer *may* designate > portions of the Covered Code as 'Multiple-Licensed'." (emphasis added). > Using multiple licensing is an option, not a mandatory practice. The > example in Exhibit A shows how to indicate the use of multiple > licensing, if you want to use it. If you don't want to use multiple > licensing then you can simply leave off the "Alternatively, ..." > paragraph when putting the MPL license notice in your own files. > > Frank > > -- > Frank Hecker > [email protected] Thank you. Frank. _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal