Re: MPL vs. Other Open Source Licenses
Greg Marine <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:32:03 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <842bdb78-9200-4cd6-a98a-4af4d07c8124@u14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> |
On Dec 5, 4:16 am, Sergey Yanovich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Either way, I do plan to drop the GPL. > > Could I ask why? Yes. I just don't completely agree with the direction GNU is taking with the GPL. > If you don't provide GPL as an option, you effectively prevent your > platform clients from linking with any GPLed code. IMHO, this won't add > up to spreading the code. I agree. So... > Public domain (and BSD-style-license also, probably) code is an > exception to the above, since it can be freely distributed to satisfy > GPL. I think I'll stick with BSD-style. I'm personally glad I asked this question. I appreciate the input given. Regards, Greg