Re: notification requirements [was Re: MPL Alpha 1 Draft Released]

  On 20.08.2010 02:23, Luis Villa wrote:
>  On 8/19/10 5:10 PM, Ben Bucksch wrote:
>> The above mentioned problems didn't exist in the old wording, it was 
>> much clearer, and had no loopholes.
> It actually had a pretty big loophole in practice, which is that it 
> only covered the Initial Developer and not later contributors.

I know. But if you made substantial contributions, chances are very good 
that you at some point created a new source file, in which case you are 
Initial Developer (hopefully you are alert enough to put yourself in the 
field). So, that wasn't too bad actually, in practice crediting major 
contributors.