Re: Source code via download -- MPL Alpha 1 Draft Released
Ben Bucksch <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:15:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07.09.2010 17:42, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 20/08/10 01:22, Ben Bucksch wrote: >> You can always offer a download on your own server and cite the URL in >> the app. > > And that was one of its most annoying provisions. When you are doing > daily builds on 3 platforms in 75 languages, do you have any idea how > much disk space it requires to keep source available for 6 months? Yes. None. <http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/archive/4958e6add3c9.tar.bz2> is fine. (Plus a similar link to the locale source.) > The point is that you don't place unnecessary burdens on the > redistributor. Limiting it to the number of copies of the binary > distributed bases an upper bound on e.g. the amount of money you need > to spend on bandwidth and your FTP server. Mandating you make it > available to the whole world opens you up to unlimited costs. That's > unreasonable, IMO. I've done it. Even in year 2000, when bandwidth was 1000 times more expansive than now, the FTP traffic costs were not significant. Fact is: if you need to write a paper letter to the company and wait for it being answers, as some companies have demanded for GPL, *that* is an "unreasonable burden" on the part of the open-source developer / customer who is just curious what they did with the Mozilla source. A burden that is so high that I am unlikely to do it, unless in exceptional circumstances. Sorry, but source code provision is at the very core of open-source. It must be loophole-free. Ben