Re: Proposed policy change: permit use of LGPLed libraries

On 21/05/12 21:50, Axel Hecht wrote:
> The example of libusb is interesting. I read that as: If a downstream
> phone maker wanted to use b2g under the provisions of the mpl to bundle
> it together with proprietory code under an EULA, they'd need to find a
> replacement for that block of code?

No... why do you think that? Android comes with a EULA, but contains
both GPL and LGPLed parts. Anyone distributing B2G already needs to be
comfortable with both the GPL (for e.g. the Linux kernel) and (I
believe; tell me if I'm wrong) the LGPL.

Gerv