Re: Mozilla and Non-Copyleft Licensing

On 13/02/13 23:34, Mike Connor wrote:
> I don't think it should be necessary to consult with licensing@ if a
> project is choosing one of the two acceptable licenses.  This strikes
> me as unnecessary overhead and friction, when the policy should
> strive for the minimum necessary work needed to comply.  Project
> owners should be free to choose either of the acceptable licenses
> based on their own circumstances.
> 
> On that principle, I would propose that we simply adopt the first
> three sentences of the above text, and cut the rest.

Fair point. First four sentences? :-)

Gerv