Re: MPL License Questions
Gervase Markham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Stum wrote: > However, what i do not understand: Can I take my Code that has been > released under MPL 1.1 before and release it under another license that > is not MPL or even Open Source compatible? (Read: Can I take my Code and > sell it in a commercial/properitary closed source application) If you are the copyright holder of the entire thing (i.e. you have not incorporated any contributions by other people), then yes, certainly. > From what I understand: > If you release Code unter GPL, you can later on revoke this license and > say: No, this code is not GPL anymore. Do not distribute it. No, this is not true. Once you've released code to a particular person under the GPL, those rights are irrevocable. You can stop distributing the code yourself, but you can't prevent anyone who already has a copy doing so. All Free software licenses work this way - if they did not, the code would not be Free. > The MPL does not allow this "revokation" - Code that has been released > under MPL is available under MPL forever. This is the case for both MPL and GPL. > That means to me: I can take this Code and use it in properitary > Products without obeying the MPL, but I cannot forbid people who got the > Code already to use it under the Terms of MPL. That is correct - again, as long as you are the copyright holder of all of it. Gerv