Re: Commercial use of Netbeans classes
Mitchell Baker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mozilla Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The SPL is the MPL, with Sun as the entity able to make changes. Anything we would say about the MPL would be useful for teh SPL. Sun's has a new license which is similar but different, but that's not the SPL. Mitchell Gervase Markham wrote: >> The SPL web site says specifically that this is the place to get >> these queries answered. On >> http://www.netbeans.org/about/legal/license.html, you will find the >> paragraph: >> >> "If you have any questions about the license, what it allows and >> prohibits, we suggest you head over to the Mozilla License forum - >> the SPL and Mozilla really are close enough to identical that any >> queries you have are best addressed there: >> news://news.mozilla.org/netscape.public.mozilla.license" > > > Whoever wrote that is wrong, in that no-one in this group has offered > to support or give advice on the SPL. I haven't even read it very > closely, and I normally answer most of the questions. It uses most of > the same text, but I would have no idea if the differences were > relevant to your question or not. > > As I understand it, Sun went off and made the SPL without consulting > mozilla.org. Given that, asking us to support their licence is a bit > rich. > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > mozilla-license mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license > >