Re: GPL vs MPL
Thorsten Haude <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ministry of Information, Department of Information Adjustments |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Moin,
* Marek Stepien wrote (2005-05-29 22:35):
>Thorsten Haude napisa?(a):
>>>I would like to ask you some information on the differences between GPL and
>>>MPL software. I have a project that is released under GPL license and I
>>>would like to use MPL libraries. Is this possible or do I have to use GPL
>>>libraries or switch to MPL??
>> You have to use GPLed libraries or switch.
>
>If that was true, there would be no GPL'd programs for Windows. :)
If it would be false, everybody would just relicense any GPLed program
they want to.
I think Windows is covered in section 3 of the GPL.
Thorsten
--
I was amazed today to find out how much Windows
can actually be used for useful things.
- Donald E. Knuth
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCmjnfW/x2JEBlodoRAmXtAJ0Qx29LZ/bqLx6Azm3u+NNR7uRXBgCgnE7Q Bg7abM8P+SILVDyR5v7YMt8= =d/Rf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----