Re: jsdtoa.c

Robert Sayre wrote:
> <http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/js/src/jsdtoa.c>
> 
> This file contains two licenses:
> 
> The standard tri-license, and a BSD/MIT-style license. 

Yes. This is fine, because the MIT licence does not forbid adding extra
terms, and the MPL terms are a superset of the MIT terms.

> The spidermonkey
> additions appear to be intermingled with the orignal Bell Labs code.
> Lucent does not seem to appear in the initial contributors section.

Arguably there should have been such a credit; however, the MPL gives no
guidance as to how these fields should be filled in, so it's hard to
tell what the right thing to do is.

I'm happy with the current situation.

Gerv