Re: considering how slow and bloated every mozilla app is..
Mike Beltzner <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:42:51 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30-Aug-09, at 2:25 PM, gperry wrote: > I am not looking for support, I don't need it. I'm just surprised to > see so little performance related development despite reading, on > nearly every forum, I visit a continually stream of I've already pointed you to other forums where discussion is taking place, and encourage you to review and contribute in any of the discussions there. We discuss performance weekly at our development meeting. If you're interested, here are some links: bugs: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=sw:%22[ts%22 project details: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Startup_Time_Improvements meeting notes: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2009-08-25#Startup_Performance https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2009-08-18#Startup_Performance The specific issues you are seeing are not commonplace, and all due respect, you're misreading the memory values between applications and not comparing apples to apples (for instance, the firefox.exe process also reports memory consumed by plugins, which iexplore.exe and chrome.exe do not). If I've misread your tone, and you actually do wish to get involved and assist, I apologize and look forward to your contributions. However, your existing tone has been hostile and sarcastic to date, and I'm not really interested in getting into arguments about whether or not the Mozilla community cares about performance or its users. You're free to believe as you wish, and contribute if it's within your interest. If you merely wish to complain, consider it registered and choose to believe what you will about our desire to fix the issue. cheers, mike