Re: 'But firefox is no longer just a browser' (Firefox fat on Javascript?)
Robert Kaiser <[email protected]> Fri, 27 May 2011 16:27:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Witten schrieb: > Are such resources being cached in working memory? Maybe most > resources should be cached explicitly on disk Well, there's always a memory vs. speed tradeoff here. Of course, we could optimize for using as little memory as in any way possible, which just would mean a very significant cost in speed, depending on how far we go. I tend to think of this in terms of "buying memory is cheap, buying time isn't". Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :)