Re: 'But firefox is no longer just a browser' (Firefox fat on Javascript?)

Robert Kaiser <[email protected]> Fri, 27 May 2011 16:27:06 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.performance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Witten schrieb:
> Are such resources being cached in working memory? Maybe most
> resources should be cached explicitly on disk

Well, there's always a memory vs. speed tradeoff here. Of course, we 
could optimize for using as little memory as in any way possible, which 
just would mean a very significant cost in speed, depending on how far 
we go. I tend to think of this in terms of "buying memory is cheap, 
buying time isn't".

Robert Kaiser


-- 
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never 
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible 
arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the 
time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :)