Security review of Resource Timing
Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:23:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnb78hajwLnoc_ERnPbx+ofFoMzXm2SM5oUC_8NrvWuA=wbPw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hey, in https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/12 folks are looking for Mozilla to give some kind of security sign off. It's still not entirely clear to me how we do this kind of thing as an organization so I thought I'd ask here. In particular, I know in the past we've been conservative revealing the specifics of network failures, even when it comes to same-origin communication. The outcome is that a ton of APIs expose that kind of thing binary, either it works or it didn't. Now https://w3c.github.io/resource-timing/ promises to give detailed information, even cross-origin if the resource on the other side opted in, for DNS, TLS, HTTP, etc. timing, even when the resource could not be completely obtained (the timings for the bits where it started failing will be zero). It's not entirely clear to me if this enables new attacks, and of what nature, but it does seem like a significant shift in policy from the tried and true binary approach. Input appreciated. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/