Re: HTML5 video streaming and flash

PhistucK <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:53:10 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.chromium.security.devel,gmane.comp.mozilla.security
Message-ID <CABc02_+n=8m92L8Nab2TQpr6r7Y206CAsL-mqfC1RTFkbM0g0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Perhaps this better be posted (with some concrete conceptual proposal for
an API or something) at -
https://discourse.wicg.io/

This is not really security related, as you just want another web platform
feature. The security of Flash, or lack thereof, is out of scope here.


☆*PhistucK*

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Kevin Chadwick <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The video element has been somewhat a prevailing success and I thank the
> developers for allowing me to remove the half a page of code that I
> used to need to support all browsers (with a fall back to mpeg2, haha)
> and providing open video formats for all to use.
>
> Some sites say that html5 video will not replace the security nightmare
> of flash in many cases (still bundled and enabled by default with
> Windows 10 and edge) as html5 does not have streaming support.
>
> Considering most servers support byte range requests nowadays, should
> truly native performant and trusted/audited streaming support be
> considered. A built-in implementation would also mean developers could
> know that users have a consistent experience and not have noscript page
> reloads and other annoyances. If the site is javascriptless users also
> may have greater confidence in a site behaving itself which is nice
> where possible.
>
> Personally I would and do rather waste bandwidth and trust a non
> streamed browser implementation than audit and bundle javscript on an
> otherwise javsacript free site.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-media-source-20140717/
>
> MSE does not meet these desires and is not actually HTML5. I also
> believe that video playing in browsers should be aiming to be as
> performant as desktop video players like mplayer or atleast vlc. MSE
> appears to be a step in the wrong direction in this regard or is it
> simply a stepping stone into the right direction?
>
>
>
> p.s.
> After writing this a though occurred, maybe a vlc plugin is actually
> better than HTML5 after all; if it could become widely used? Obviously
> vlc supports too many formats and would have too many exploits but a
> limited codec version perhaps, but I guess it's streaming
> implementation would have a hard time to make it into servers in any
> case?
>
> Thanks,
>         Kc
> --
>
> KISSIS - Keep It Simple So It's Securable
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Security-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected]
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Security-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]