Re: HTML5 video streaming and flash
PhistucK <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:53:10 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chromium.security.devel,gmane.comp.mozilla.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABc02_+n=8m92L8Nab2TQpr6r7Y206CAsL-mqfC1RTFkbM0g0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Perhaps this better be posted (with some concrete conceptual proposal for an API or something) at - https://discourse.wicg.io/ This is not really security related, as you just want another web platform feature. The security of Flash, or lack thereof, is out of scope here. ☆*PhistucK* On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Kevin Chadwick <[email protected]> wrote: > The video element has been somewhat a prevailing success and I thank the > developers for allowing me to remove the half a page of code that I > used to need to support all browsers (with a fall back to mpeg2, haha) > and providing open video formats for all to use. > > Some sites say that html5 video will not replace the security nightmare > of flash in many cases (still bundled and enabled by default with > Windows 10 and edge) as html5 does not have streaming support. > > Considering most servers support byte range requests nowadays, should > truly native performant and trusted/audited streaming support be > considered. A built-in implementation would also mean developers could > know that users have a consistent experience and not have noscript page > reloads and other annoyances. If the site is javascriptless users also > may have greater confidence in a site behaving itself which is nice > where possible. > > Personally I would and do rather waste bandwidth and trust a non > streamed browser implementation than audit and bundle javscript on an > otherwise javsacript free site. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-media-source-20140717/ > > MSE does not meet these desires and is not actually HTML5. I also > believe that video playing in browsers should be aiming to be as > performant as desktop video players like mplayer or atleast vlc. MSE > appears to be a step in the wrong direction in this regard or is it > simply a stepping stone into the right direction? > > > > p.s. > After writing this a though occurred, maybe a vlc plugin is actually > better than HTML5 after all; if it could become widely used? Obviously > vlc supports too many formats and would have too many exploits but a > limited codec version perhaps, but I guess it's streaming > implementation would have a hard time to make it into servers in any > case? > > Thanks, > Kc > -- > > KISSIS - Keep It Simple So It's Securable > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Security-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Security-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]