Re: Removing Firefox Version Number
Eliot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Asa, I would urge you to spend a lot of time on this decision and to gain the benefit of a lot of input. There are both benefits and risks of this change, and we have some historical evidence to understand both. I refer you to the work of Stefan Frei et. al, in which he looked at zero-day exploits and update times (published in WEIS), where going back as far as Firefox 2 you had a substantial advantage over other browsers (something like > 80% in as little as 72 hours), most notably Microsoft and Apple. However, one of the reasons for that advantage was confidence in Mozilla. There can be no doubt but that there have been compatibility problems as late as this year between major versions of Firefox, most notably with 32->64bit plug-ins. There has been a distinction between "security" updates and other forms of updates. Having that distinction provided a confidence to users that they lacked with Microsoft when, for instance, they rolled out Microsoft Genuine Advantage, and other functional changes through an update that then caused users problems. Now it seems you propose to lump all of these changes together in a way that the user will not be able to distinguish, i.e., repeating Microsoft's mistakes. The result will be higher risks of incompatibilities, either between web sites or plug-ins. There IS probably evidence going the other way on this, most particularly Apple's experience with iOS and app updates. After all, who knows what version their apps are running. But that is considerably different than the underlying platform. I will bet people know what version of iOS their iPhone/iPad runs.