Re: Removing Firefox Version Number
Asa Dotzler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert Kaiser wrote: > DaveG schrieb: >> We're almost upon Firefox 6, yet only 66% of the users I see here are >> running a current version. > > Yes, we're doing a bad job on sending update offers to 3.6 users, we > should be way more aggressive there. We also need to improve the regular > update experience. We need to get that number to over 80% to claim even > something near to "success" and over 90% to be somewhat satisfied, IMHO. We're 90% where we're actually using our rapid release process. Firefox 3.6 is still supported (and will be until we sort out the Enterprise problem.) so we can't say that Firefox 6 or 7 are mandatory security updates for 3.6 yet and if we can't say that then we're not actually on the rapid release cycle for those users. My point is not that we don't need to worry about those users. My point is that they cannot be used to directly criticize the effectiveness of our rapid release process. Firefox 5 was the first "rapid" update. Firefox 6 is the second. When we've got to Firefox 7 and 8 and we're at 95+% upgrades for rapid release users, I think we'll be able to claim success. I want it to be 99+% of course, and we shouldn't stop until we get there (or better) but we're not experiencing a disaster with the rapid release process by any means. - A