Re: Removing Firefox Version Number

Deigo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.ui
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Knowing the version number allows me to see weather I'll be able to
use an extension or not. I now know that ReloadEvery is only
compatible with 5 or below (at least for now) when I log into a new
computer I can check the version in help->about to see weather that
browser will take my extension or I'll have to roll-back.
Interestingly, this was the less important part of my post. My "real"
question was what the real problem we were trying to solve by removing
the version number from help->about is. It seemed to me it was to
avoid confusing some users. Is this that case? Additionally, I put
forward the idea that at least for me (and I'd bet several other
users) the ONLY function of help->about was to get version numbers and
this would break user expectations. I'm not saying this alone is
reason to leave the version number, but removing it certainly costs
you something from a user expectations point of view, so I was
wondering what we were GAINING by removing the version number from
that particular place but still leaving it in other, slightly less
intuitive places like help->troubleshooting.
On Aug 16, 9:56 pm, Asa Dotzler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Deigo wrote:
> > --Slightly Off-topic--
> > Auto-upgraded to firefox 6 and lost access to ReloadEvery addon which
> > is distributed by AMO but apparently didn't have a forced version bump
> > even though it's among the top 70 firefox add-ons. Must have not
> > passed the compatibility check. If we have a addon we'd like to keep
> > using, won't we need to know firefox version numbers to maintain
> > compatibility?
>
> I don't understand this question. The add-on is incompatible. Knowing
> the version number doesn't change that.  When we add a "test this
> add-on" switch to the add-on manager (or something similar) so you can
> enable incompatible add-ons, that will help you keep using it. But the
> version number doesn't really help anything here as far as I can see.
>
> Can you explain further what you mean here?
>
> - A
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.