Re: Removing Firefox Version Number
Vega <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <3fbc0492-4aca-4dbe-ad09-678e02d7c505@q12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
I'm not a developer, neither am I technology-illiterate, but have never felt 'confused' about what version I'm running and whether it's the latest. Sorry Mozilla, but this is another user you've lost. Maybe am repeating stuff that others have already mentioned, but here goes: 1. Asa has even failed to provide numbers (or percentage) of such 'confused' users perhaps wandering around in a daze wondering about their Firefox version. 2. Why haven't Mozilla conducted an online poll to check if users would prefer this? If you have, mind publishing the results? 3. As always, The Ones from the Land of Perpetual 'Net fail to appreciate the need in emerging countries like India (where I'm from) - to NOT have automatic updates always on. In fact, I only update Firefox when I *know* there's a new release. Because I like to be and stay in control of the version I'm running, and downloading. And no, just clicking the "Check for updates" button for the removal of 'confusion' as Mozilla puts it, doesn't work for me, 'coz I'd be spending my net usage quota (tiny, but tangible) just to run the dashed check even if there's no update available. Has Mozilla even considered that? In terms of numbers I mean, which Mozilla seems reluctant to face. 4. Asa's responses smack (if not reek) of hubris, and that, though cavil, is enough of a reason to be put off. Quoting Tyler: "Thank you for showing to me that Mozilla is not the community that I need to be a part of." On Aug 16, 5:54 am, Tyler Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 15, 2:35 pm, Asa Dotzler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Tyler Downer wrote: > > > Asa, would you mind clearly, and with supporting data, tests, metrics, > > > show What problem this is addressing, Who is affected by it, What our > > > goal is (long-term and short-term, and not generic terms like "getting > > > rid of versions") and How this solution addresses the problem better > > > than the solutions we already have in place. I truly would like to > > > know the clear answers to all of these questions, I may not be seeing > > > data that you are (Maybe 50% of users sit on About all day wondering > > > when Firefox last checked for updates, I don't know), but I need > > > concrete information, not generic buzzwords. > > > It's simple. We are moving to a release model that makes version numbers > > meaningless and unactionable for consumers. In that model, version > > numbers go away. > > > - A > > Thank you for the evasive and non-answer that was simply using big > words to dodge the question. Frankly Asa, I've been with Mozilla for > 3+ years, I've touched tens of thousands of bugs, I've written and > submitted 23 patches to the Mozilla code base, and submitted many more > bugs, I have to say your attitude, is driving me out the door. You > complain I am not showing you or the UX team respect. I've given you a > chance to explain the Who, What, Why and How of this issue. You did > not. I would say that by not having the common courtesy to explain > your decisions or ideas to me and the other members of the community, > Asa and Mozilla in general is showing how it truly feels about the > community that is behind it. Mozilla is better than the community, and > does not have to explain anything to them. All I wanted was a clear > explanation of your reasoning, an UX's reasoning behind the change, in > case there was information that I had missed. You decided not to give > me and the community that courtesy. Thank you for showing to me that > Mozilla is not the community that I need to be a part of.