Re: Removing Firefox Version Number
Steve <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <2f375dea-6b0b-4e63-a96f-ec8fc33986c1@w22g2000prj.googlegroups.com> |
On Aug 21, 6:53 pm, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > At the risk of sounding childish - which is not my intent, but could > likely be misread in the following: > "I'll show you mine, if you show me yours." Okay - I'm seeing two use cases called out now. The first: Version number mismatch between platforms causing user anxiety. Example given: Fx 5.0 (Windows) vs 5.0.1 (Mac). I didn't see this as a use case when you were presenting it previously, but as a edge case that could use a communication cleanup. After banging my head through hundreds of messages, I think I finally get it. And think that Isaac Stitz's suggestion could be useful here, as you've already noted ("check that the version isn't different for platform X between version Y & Z, and report platform X has running version Z"). The second: "We believe that the most common case is to be assured that she is indeed on the latest version, and in the rare case that she's opened the About window before and update has finished, that we can assure her that the update is in progress (and hopefully finish it out really quickly.)" --Asa, 20-Aug-2011, 17:40-- and that "The use case we think is most important, and the one we've optimized for, is the user who wants to know if she's on the latest version of Firefox." --Asa, 21- Aug-2011, 16:16-- I think there's a valid third use case, which I called out in my post earlier this evening, of a user who is new to Firefox, but not to windowed applications. If that use case doesn't seem particularly relevant to the UX development team, as part of the "woo another 500 million users", so be it. It just seemed to be a use case that was glaringly omitted, and I was trying to understand why. Regards, --Steve Cook--