Re: Stop the bling, fergawdssake!
Greywolf <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:25:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13/11/2011 8:11 PM, Andr=E9 Neves wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Art Kocsis<[email protected]> wrote: >> Another example of the costs of opposite arbitrary choices: Go to the UK= or >> New Zealand and drive a car (or vice versa if you are already there). Or >> even step off the side walk in traffic and notice which direction you lo= ok. >> Here the consequences may be fatal. > Actually, according to Wikipedia, =ABoriginally most traffic drove on > the left worldwide=BB. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-_and_left-hand_traffic#History > > So I guess the choice to change was the one to drive on the right hand si= de. > And I don't think it was arbitrary either. > > HTH You can make equally good cases for driving left and for driving right. = Thus, either choice is arbitrary. But making different choices in = different parts of the world is stupid. Wolf K.