Re: Why should ordinary user have to tweak the program after updating?
Ron Hunter <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:06:03 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/16/2011 8:54 AM, Greywolf wrote: > On 16/11/2011 10:32 AM, Ron Hunter wrote: > [...] >> My computers all run 24/7 365. I use them several times a day, and at >> odd times, including during the night. I also have an application that >> monitors for substitute teacher jobs, and alarms if one comes up, so >> that needs to run all the time. > [...] > > I use to do that too, until I did a few calculations about how much > power they use. Even asleep, a desktop with several "sleeping" > peripherals plugged in can use 100 watts or more. That adds up to 60KWH > per month or more. A wall wart consumes about 1 KWH per month, even when > it's not charging the laptop battery. And so on. All those "low-drain" > thingies we have around the house add up to an astonishing amount of > power overall if left on. I've seen estimates of 5-10% savings if they > were turned when not in use, which for most people is at least 12 hours > a day. Granted, some devices must be on 24/7, but there aren't very many > of those. > > HTH > Wolf K. Well, I figure that if I get 1 half-day job a month it will pay for all that electricity usage. Fact is that I get an average of 2 full day jobs a week from that program. The alternative is either missing the jobs, or staying at the computer 24/7 hitting return to update the job search, monitor on, and all that. So which is more wasteful? I am more than willing to pay for the convenience of not having to pull all those plugs, and replug them each day, several times.