Re: Archiving feature
Annailis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.wishlist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gorm wrote: > On 13 Mar, 13:46, Annailis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gorm wrote: >>> On 8 Mar, 14:17, Annailis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Gorm wrote: >>>>> I have left Outlook behind,because of instabilities in the Profile >>>>> handling (Windows NT Windows Messaging Subsystem). >>>>> In Thunderbird I miss the an archiving system. This is a very useful >>>>> features in Outlook, With many thousands of messages, an Archiving >>>>> feature would be very appreciated. >>>>> Gorm >>>> An archiving feature is coming in TBird 3.0. Check out the >>>> latest Beta Release to see what you think of it (don't use it >>>> with any e-mail you might not want to lose!). >>>> Ann W. >>> Hi Ann. >>> I downloaded the Beta 2 and checked out the Archiving feature. >>> As I understand it; you are supposed to select one or several messages >>> that you want to Archive. At archiving an Archive folder is created in >>> the In tray of the current account and the selected content is passed >>> on to it. >>> My idea of an Archiving feature is a function that move the selected >>> messages to a folder, a remote IMAP or a Local folder. Each individual >>> account should have a choice to store the Archive Remotely or >>> Locally. >>> If you need to upload an archived message again you should just simply >>> select it, wherever it is stored, and have an upload choice which >>> moves it back where it was moved from in the first place. It the >>> original folder is not there it could just place it in the default >>> account In tray. >>> Well, just me ideas. >>> Regards >>> Gorm >> Your archiving needs are more complex than mine, but it would be >> nice to have those various options. It might be awhile with >> Thunderbird. >> >> Ann W. > > For the time being I store the old stuff away Locally on a hard drive- > Some vital mail messages are stored on the server for also others to > access and copy, should they so wish. Many mail have also got > enclosures of various kind. With many thousand of mail that must be > stored and archiving system is therefore important. Thunderbird is not > at all ideal but, who knows what it might include when the programmer > group is reading....... > > Gorm Well, you could always print out all those e-mails and file them away in storage boxes <grin>. We've now become slaves to our electronic mail, etc. I gather that if the people working on Thunderbird could be employed full time, things might go more quickly. Even then, it takes time. Ann W.