Re: Thunderbird addressbook printing
Melchert Fruitema <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.wishlist |
|---|---|
| Organization | free travel agency (no sweat, no hurry) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03-04-2009 02:37 CET, The Real Bev composed this enchanting statement: > Melchert Fruitema wrote: > >> On 30-03-2009 21:32 CET, The Real Bev composed this enchanting >> statement: >>> What I'd really like to be able to do is print my addressbook with >>> only 2 fields: name and email address. >>> <x> >>> Am I the only one who'd like to do this? Most of the fields in the >>> addressbook file are absolutely useless but insist on being printed >>> anyway :-( >>> >> Did you try to import your (exported) addressbook into a spreadsheet? > > Yup. That was one of the steps. I seem to remember that I deleted > extra columns, wrote it off to a text file, read it into open office > in a 2-column format and then had to do other stuff. I think there > were a couple of other steps because some of my addressbook entries > have first name and/or last name/and or display name. All told, a > real pain. > > Do people really use all those extra fields? > Probably not, and there seems to be no limit to what each AB clone can invent to address. Try import/export across applications and systems, you'll be in for a treat! My view is that for a platform there is only one system address book, to which applications interface thru APIs. Thus, away with TB's address books and only keep the application specifics in a (mini) SQL table. Having said that, I must admit that the MacOS Address Book application is pretty smart, but not very friendly to the average or occasional user. Moreover, I do favour Thunderbird over Apple Mail, on my MacOS version. -- Kind regards, Melchert (MacOS 10.3.9 / Firefox 2.0, Thunderbird 2.0)