Re: Different Colors for different Certificate Authorities

Ali Khalfan <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:32:34 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.wishlist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--===============8846243733977262771==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="f1PFX56tVXh65UVsKVPiJ3X4cPQe6Nhqd"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--f1PFX56tVXh65UVsKVPiJ3X4cPQe6Nhqd
From: Ali Khalfan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Different Colors for different Certificate Authorities
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

anybody besides spammers can give me any feedback on this?




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Different Colors for different Certificate Authorities
From: Ali Khalfan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed Sep 14 2016 08:49:24 GMT+0300 (AST)
> Regular users are told to lock for the SSL lock to make sure the site i=
s
> secure.  In the old days, it was a lot harder to get an SSL certificate=

> without some sort of rigorous verification (e.g. registration document,=

> whois repository, proof of actual owner of the entity owning the domain=
).
>
> It is a lot easier to get a valid SSL certificate today.  Some
> certificate authorities, such as Truecrypt, provide certificates simply=

> if proof is provided that a domain is owned.  Because Truecrypt mainly
> cares about encryption.  Needless to say, a miscreant setting up a
> phishing website does own a domain.  So, encryption is provided but not=

> authenticity.  A regular user will look at the lock, which is green, an=
d
> think the site is secure (while it is not).=20
>
> I would think different colors should be on the bar based on the
> certificate authority.  If the certificate is signed by an authority
> known to perform rigorous verification it should be different from a
> certificate signed by an authority verifies by a simple e-mail
> verification.=20
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
>



--f1PFX56tVXh65UVsKVPiJ3X4cPQe6Nhqd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Q/Ba
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--f1PFX56tVXh65UVsKVPiJ3X4cPQe6Nhqd--

--===============8846243733977262771==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
wishlist mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/wishlist

--===============8846243733977262771==--