Re: Destination directory specification

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>   
>> Personally I would favour requiring the -o 'option' and getting rid of
>> all the other ways to specify output directory.  However I seem to
>> recall that a lot of higher-level tools using dvdauthor rely on the dest
>> attribute.  So these two need to stay.  The OUTPUTDIR environment
>> variable, however, has a very generic name and runs the risk of
>> conflicting with other tools.
>>     
>
> Hmm, perhaps I should remove the OUTPUTDIR thing. Three different ways 
> of specifying the output is perhaps a bit much.
>
> Are we still agreed that “-o” overrides “dest”?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Dvdauthor-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dvdauthor-users
>   
Yes, I believe the -o option should take precedence.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Dvdauthor-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dvdauthor-users