Re: Shutter lifetime?
Pål Gunnar Ellingsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.gphoto.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPSiub8FyK1WwgkTHRuK-0+04dXcZQs-=WvMw2y+fz-xoYrsGQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi I understand that. I don't really know what the compacts have, but they are probably not made to last that many shots. You could use board level cameras instead (USB controlled cameras (similar to web-cams) but for taking pictures), but it depends on what you're after. As for the D7000 we ran 4-5 cameras until they broke and all survived that amount of images. I'm a bit sceptical to that way of measuring the lifetime, as using a camera by draging it around, in different climates, etc, is completely different to mounting it in a controlled room We run ours mounted in the same place and looking at the sky. Cheers Pål On 15 February 2017 at 11:16, pprovaz <[email protected]> wrote: > :) I'm not that rich to put spare A7s's in photobooths :) > > Well, I am not sure what kind of a shutter is used in compacts like Canon > Powershots, for example. If there is a mechanical one, or if it's based on > electronical timing only. Has anybody a clue? Something is still heard > during the shot, so there may be some moving part. > > I think that you were extremely lucky with your D7000. There are no > statistical data for this model yet, but when looking on the D5000 data > here > http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/nikon_d5000.htm > .. the most usual lifetime is 10 000 to 20 000 shots only (= in average). > > So for me (and also for most of the people out there), if there is a need > for some camera to withstand several years of automated shooting for a > reasonable price, the compacts are the only option. My Canon SX100 does > surprisingly good and sharp job when looking at the image quality (mainly > when a $20 price paid for it is taken into consideration) > > I wish the gPhoto to be able to control Olympus micro4/3's soon (like > E-PL1, > E-PM1 or so), because they can be purchased for a few bucks these days, and > the picture quality is quite nice for the purpose. > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gphoto-software.10949. > n7.nabble.com/Shutter-lifetime-tp16567p16571.html > Sent from the gphoto-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Gphoto-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gphoto-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gphoto-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gphoto-user