Re: Matroska-devel Digest, Vol 139, Issue 1
Jerome Martinez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 17/04/2015 15:04, Marcus Johnson a écrit : > Why LPCM (which I assume is using wav, wav64, RF64, or BWF) instead of > FLAC? Audio bitrate is usually a lot lower than video bitrate (and it is more and more true with higher video resolutions, we don't increase so much the channel count or bit depth), and lot of professional users (memory institutions, broadcasters...) consider that having an audio codec provides too much complexity compared to the overall (audio+video) compression ratio benefit. This may change in the future. _______________________________________________ Matroska-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel