Re: EBML specification component for review - Element Data Size
Moritz Bunkus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey, > I know, EBML was supposed to be generic and flexible, but I would say > experience with Matroska taught us that this specific aspect is not > really needed. I know of at least four (private) projects that use EBML as a basis for various in-house solutions. Sure, it hasn't reached any kind of global use, but Matroska is certainly not the only one. Anyway, I don't care that strongly about the point, so I won't argue it further. Limiting the maximum ID length to 4 is fine with me. Kind regards, mosu _______________________________________________ Matroska-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJVQ30hAAoJEHSvAK3y4yyFsacQANKRT27pD9cZlX3+KiKWv8F2 mC+ECClAe2imf4YpMDuYpsQ8lN6qC7+ckMayYgBu3dXc4EZCBcRmwIUkdkeIOyvF e1vkVumghGtcSu+1Ows7XgzAOvKXnAfwGhMlzDxpUAsThvt9uj7pqfqz3IDEvogA h49B9OP2+gRRb3U96XkA3lBkkln4F5ubHXgvvV66xkYoP+aqtn9vFrCRJZIZK9lz A0HWvalB3A1LONnrV1QzCHQq2Wp75ZT4V4+8KV7dTroLMO33BPOsQqeUOr7aYKLK HMBSUEumGf+RpHpzMyxhPvX9/CjT5ENUthjedqrULUxMIzbBTLdS3U3HZ7jy+u6c +wU4HgG/PhjH0XW094SmwuvBFWfKRmdnx0r68NVWEirXuIy6sPpKtINp6vV7jCrW +djgKLxz0Spdt6bw5o8vTH/WrfGg7WHjt9QZr0MfB1lut8Alva3aq4YqP0Bb/YC+ /C3lTye4BwgqFxH8h+sFja9PCKAGKyvaCQqcyrMKSHDk/Ye1cN/ipuBIy2IST78X wVyZMwcIsmD9g4prrzpu/uj05q8sdIZ6q+X14zc+Xb0fPFIDrUhKwgoZiSwBe3Qi MRA2qI25rVzXll04oqHSxwJT90Q+Iw7E/8dqH3lQpIjYcfrcRlhBqOfptdHmhgNg tgaZj/uILOX8SfgkQup1 =2rO2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----