Re: FFV1/MKV IETF Session followup
"Sebastian G. <bastik>" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
25.07.2015, 00:08 Ralph Giles: > On 24/07/15 06:36 AM, Sebastian G. <bastik> wrote: > >> How does one play a Matroska file with Firefox? It supports WebM >> which is a subset of Matroska, but I am unable to play a Matroska >> file that contains an h.264 encoded video, which is supported by >> Firefox as well. > > Firefox only supports the vp8, vp9, vorbis, and opus codecs in the > WebM variant of Matroska. To play h.264 you have to use the mp4 containe > r. I was aware that the combination of h.264 and MP4 work in Firefox, but not with Matroska. Mozilla still could support Matroska files containing h.264 streams without diluting WebM. > In Nightly and Developer Edition builds you can remux Matroska to mp4 > in javascript and play it through the MediaSource Extensions API. > Hopefully that will be available in release builds in a few months. > This API is available in Chrome, Safari, and Microsoft Edge as well. To me it sounds like a workaround. At least when there is support for a subset of a container format. > As you say, WebM is a subset of Matroska. There's value in having a > separately-labelled container with only free-to-implement codecs. I'd > much rather people put Opus alongside h.264 in mp4 than in WebM. > I appreciate the value of the WebM Project. One is that you know what to expect what is inside the container. I would not favor h.264 streams within WebM as it goes against their goals, I guess, but to have support for Matroska with Opus and h.264, because it is supported anyway. Best Regards, Sebastian G. (bastik) _______________________________________________ Matroska-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel