Re: Several (minor) issues or underspecified areas in the MKV spec

2015-10-05 18:59 GMT+02:00 Michael Bradshaw <[email protected]>:
> Sorry for the bombardment of emails.
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Michael Bradshaw <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi! I'll launch right into my questions:
>> ...
>
>
> Two more questions for the MKV spec:
>
> Is the table in Chapter Specifications duplicated twice?

Ooops, fixed.

> Should the spec perhaps require EBMLMaxSizeLength to be exactly 8? Letting
> it be < 8 doesn't seem like a useful feature, but perhaps I'm missing some
> useful use case.

For the EBML header, I think it should be 4. For the Stream, it really
depends on the stream but files that will never get large data may not
want to allow large EBML overhead.

>
> _______________________________________________
> Matroska-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
> Read Matroska-Devel on GMane:
> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel



-- 
Steve Lhomme
Matroska association Chairman
_______________________________________________
Matroska-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel