Re: Proposed IETF working group for standardization of Matroska

   1. Re: Proposed IETF working group for standardization of

>       Matroska (Sebastian G. <bastik>)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:32:57 +0200
> From: "Sebastian G. <bastik>" <[email protected]>
> To: Discussion about the current and future development of Matroska
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Matroska-devel] Proposed IETF working group for
>         standardization of Matroska
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> 08.09.2015, 20:32 Tessa Fallon:
>
> Hello,
>
> > A new charter for an IETF working group to standardize FFV1, FLAC, and
> > Matroska has been shared on the IETF Dispatch working group for review:
> >
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/uTpBvSubeyDMTUAoupa5XZOS86Y
> >
> > If you're not already subscribed to the Dispatch mailing list, please do
> so
> > here:
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>
> I had already subscribed to the Dispatch mailing list.
>
> Am I supposed to say something (in favor) of creating a working group,
> even though I might not participate in working on anything regarding the
> goal?
>

It is worthwhile for people to know that there is support for the
initiative, so saying something as simple as "+1" is helpful :)

>
> I'm not sure if I have anything to contribute nor do I know if I would
> find the time. I might be busy for a longer period of time and not be
> able to give any input. I'm not even sure if I am willing to give input
> for various reasons.
>
> > I look forward to your feedback and to discussion of the charter.  If
> > you're interested in working on this, I especially hope to hear from you!
>
> >> *Proposed Name*: CELLAR: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and
> Realtime
> >> transmission
>
> Does this name have any relevance later on? I don't know what 'Codec
> Encoding' would mean.
>
> STELLAR: STructured Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime
> transmisson
>

The name doesn't have any significance other than as an identifier within
the IETF.  BTW, I love STELLAR!  I'm certainly happy to mention it as an
alternative.

>
> >> Standards Track specification [...]
>
> What do these sentences mean?
>
> Standardization of the track specification? The current 'standard' of
> the track specification?
>
> Best regards,
> Sebastian G. (bastik)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matroska-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Matroska-devel Digest, Vol 144, Issue 4
> **********************************************
>

_______________________________________________
Matroska-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel