Re: Several (minor) issues or underspecified areas in the MKV spec
Moritz Bunkus <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:15:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey, > I think the current wording of that statement is a little ambiguous > and it's not entirely clear that master elements should not be > assumed. If mandatory master elements were to be assumed when absent, > then it would change what should be done. Perhaps some wording > indicating master elements should not be assumed could be added? Masters cannot have default values. Only elements with default elements can be assumed if they're absent. Therefore I don't see the need for such language. Only non-master elements can have a default value. Kind regards, mosu _______________________________________________ Matroska-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJWT3FgAAoJEHSvAK3y4yyFwJ8P/iBzAKeyyyu9JeO4SzT9yiq8 pnBb5XxdazSI3FxACQ2OqoBHS0DdDhR+/NbDLqrkCyW89juxxzKV3TTAwCtmTfK6 /VuJR/prP86DNr8+BnEOWaEErbj72mTZrQhFhKccYjD0OAx+sgp9ZOH8N+O4w2g9 X4T+I3Nw2xl/1JQRqmYC/8E7MadaggwTiqURkq93tQ/Ym7gxRtjFRV9b0tdlhlaG ci4iRFn+g6xWSRxycEfhYls5dzD1GgIrEWltMVK/Ja5twj4Gh7mKr/C6c5SgABPj x4T+ePoA8IX1DSajoToCIIVQm3AMo0q+ZneMTecmtLzJqcJKdTUpS0Np8Yd85q5N 6l/UYpqT1jIe5Ex8RIaTcywlGRiJ86MyCKfKoBprwBctWnpOcXn+rtpPs1o57i+g 4XwLges37PxdHRZRkrVET+O3kj5JHcW1z7LenuJlr2AHB5F/Hj7rwZlwP5eNB1tY ioFf9g9mrKDlE1prLG8AMICcq+8PnokIfR/4/q+Fhp0KTREeNxW3xXZZDIlbp/ON fUTgtNE4hClVIVeW/ACloQEboOTXTkqkryHAftMB6I0ImY2fD1ccMYYUXbBSrgDg FQYraVyC0wZRWoczuxM0tMqkUYS0QS1Lol7FQ+ga4d3GVSFFI5N90di7n+8E6mgQ WtJ7ss2NnO2fNq/Z5Tgm =1/ba -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----