Re: [Cellar] Colour Format proposal
Jerome Martinez <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Jan 2016 23:08:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 05/01/2016 22:54, Dave Rice a écrit : > [...] >> Element Name: ColourMatrix >> Level: 5 >> ID: [55][A1] >> Mandatory: ma >> Multiple: - >> Default: 2 >> Type: u >> Description: ColourMatrix of the video. (0: IEC 61966-2-1 (sRGB), 1: >> BT709, >> 2: Unspecified, > > Any reason for "Unspecified" to be #2 rather than #0? Do these numbers > align with a FFmpeg/libav enumeration? Similar to Apple QuickTime nclc specs, ISO/MPEG Video / AVC / HEVC, ITU H.26x. I recommend to not change that. > > [...] > >> Element Name: ChromaSubsampling >> Level: 5 >> ID: [55][A3] >> Mandatory: ma >> Multiple: - >> Default: 0 >> Type: u >> Description: (0: 4:2:0, 2: 4:2:2, 4: 4:4:4) > > This is mandatory, but there is no Unspecified option. If I want to > clarify that a contained 4:1:1 DV stream uses bt.601 there is no valid > way to say this, since if ColourMatrix is used then ChromaSubsampling > must also be used, but there is no options that fit 4:1:1. +1 (must be optional or unknown possibility, and more cases) Jérôme _______________________________________________ Matroska-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel