Re: ReferenceTimecode tracks in Matroska proposal
Michael Bradshaw <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:12:36 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHUoETLOZdPi_HaiY5XgytTMaQ5arpf1EGW8WrfrUZWCvUv_0w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Dave Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is an early draft of Elements for managing ReferenceTimecode tracks. > Matroska uses the term 'Timecode' to reference presentation timestamps, > whereas other formats (QuickTime, MXF) use 'Timecode' to reference a time > reference that is added to the timeline which is inpendent of the > presentation (i.e. a QuickTime file with a timecode track that starts at > one hour aka 1:00:00;00 would not cause a one hour delay before playback > starts). In the context of Matroska I am using ReferenceTimecode (for now) > to refer to QuickTime/MXF style timecode tracks. Will the current timecode elements (TimecodeScale, Timecode, ReferenceTimeCode, TrackTimecodeScale, and block's Timecode) be renamed to "timestamp" or "presentation timestamp" (or something like that)? I hope so. I know this is tangential to your post, but I want to get a "big picture" in my mind of where this is going to end up. I'm also slightly concerned that using the name "ReferenceTimecode" will be a bit confusing to developers, given the old ReferenceTimeCode (DivX trick track extensions) element. --Michael _______________________________________________ Matroska-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel