Re: Request For Comment

Am 01.04.2022 um 14:15 schrieb Steve Lhomme:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As you probably know, we are working hard on the Matroska
> specifications at the IETF. We already got EBML as a RFC [1]. We are
> in the process of finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we
> submit the document for formal review before "final" publishing, we
> would like people who know a bit about Matroska (or not) to review the
> current draft in case there are parts missing, hard to decipher or,
> even worse, bugs.
>
> This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find
> draft 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4.
> Some unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal
> specifications. They can be found in Annex A.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/
> _______________________________________________
> Matroska-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
> Read Matroska-Devel on GMane:
> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel


The Range and the Number of valid EBML IDs for one octect are still
wrong.(Table 4)

_______________________________________________
Matroska-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel