Re: [RFC] Documentary presenter tagging

2016-02-02 20:51 GMT+01:00 Dave Rice <[email protected]>:
>
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Pierre Choffet via Matroska-users
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Le 26/01/2016 05:25, Steve Lhomme a écrit :
>
> I agree with the additions, although we're in the process of formally
> standardizing Matroska at the IETF and tags will likely be discussed.
> So I'd refrain making such changes until we reach that part in the
> process.
>
> Hi Steve, thanks for your answer
>
> Sounds good to me, I'll resubmit this request once the standardization
> process has ended.
>
>
> In standardizing the metadata for the roles of contributions, it may make
> sense to adopt an external authority. For instance PBCore manages a
> vocabulary called contributorRole:
> http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/vocabulary_id/127.html
> http://v1.pbcore.org/PBCore/picklists/picklist_contributorRole.html.
> Adopting such a list may be more effective than okaying the values one by
> one as requested.

Interoperability of tags is definitely a good thing. The question is,
what's the best basis to start from ? Matroska is certainly not the
one.

We did this mapping a long time ago.
https://matroska.org/technical/specs/tagging/othertagsystems/comparetable.html

> Dave Rice



-- 
Steve Lhomme
Matroska association Chairman
_______________________________________________
Matroska-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-users
Read Matroska-Users on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.user